Political Populism

Introduction to Populism

Populism refers to a range of political stances and rhetorical styles that emphasize the interests and will of “the people,” often juxtaposing this group against “the elite.” The term originated in the late 19th century to describe US agrarian movements that promoted the interests of farmers and laborers against urban capitalists.

Some key characteristics associated with populism include:

• Appealing to “the common man” and popular passions. Populist leaders frequently use direct, simple language that resonates with the masses.
• Promoting a starkly binary worldview that pits “the people” against “the elite.” Populists frame issues in terms of a moral struggle between the interests of common folk and the corrupted establishment.
• Claiming to represent the unified “will of the people.” Populists often position themselves as the sole authentic voice of the masses.
• Advocating majoritarianism and opposing representative institutions that mediate popular demands. Populist movements favor direct expressions of the volonté générale (general will).
• Supporting charismatic, authoritarian leadership built on personalistic ties. Populist leaders often cultivate a strong connection to their base while consolidating power.
• Using demagoguery and folksy rhetoric to galvanize mass support. Populist communicators use resonant slogans, symbols, and charged language.

So in summary, populism denotes a set of political beliefs, attitudes, and rhetorical techniques that separates “the people” from “the elite” and calls for the will of the masses to be translated directly into policy.

Populist Rhetoric and Messaging

Populist politicians and parties tend to employ rhetoric and messaging that focuses on appealing to “ordinary” people, expressing disdain for the establishment elite, and promising to restore a country to greatness.

Common populist rhetorical techniques include:

• Portraying themselves as champions of the common people against corrupt, self-serving elites. Populists claim that mainstream political parties and institutions serve privileged special interests rather than the majority.
• Using simple, direct language that resonates with ordinary citizens. Populists avoid complex policy discussions and instead rely on slogans, symbols, and emotional appeals.
• Evoking nostalgia and longing for an idealized past. Populists promise to restore a mythical “golden age” before the nation lost its greatness due to betrayal by elites.
• Framing politics as a struggle between “the people” and “the elite”. Populists sharply divide society into the virtuous masses and the corrupt ruling class.
• Attacking institutions like the media, judiciary, and regulatory agencies as being part of the elite establishment. Populists accuse these institutions of obstructing the will of the people.
• Making lavish promises to improve conditions for the people. Populists propose bold, sweeping changes like dramatically reducing immigration or providing universal income, without details on implementation.
• Projecting themselves as strong, decisive leaders who wield power on behalf of the masses. Populists cultivate a charismatic, tough persona.

This style of rhetoric and messaging is intended to resonate with ordinary citizens who feel left behind economically and socially. By positioning themselves as the voice of the people, populists aim to mobilize mass support for their movements.

Populism in Europe

In recent years, Europe has seen a concerning rise in populist parties and movements, posing challenges to liberal democracy. Many of these movements are on the far-right of the political spectrum, campaigning on anti-immigration, Eurosceptic, and nationalist platforms.

One of the most notable examples is the Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom in 2016, which saw a slim majority vote to leave the European Union. The Leave campaign made effective use of populist, anti-establishment rhetoric, criticizing EU bureaucracy and appealing to nativist sentiments. Since the referendum, the UK has undergone a tumultuous period of political instability and uncertainty over its future relationship with Europe.

Other European countries have seen the growth of prominent far-right, populist parties such as the National Rally in France, the Freedom Party in the Netherlands, the Swedish Democrats, and the Alternative for Germany party. While these parties have failed to win national elections, they have gained a sizable share of the vote by stirring anxieties over immigration, national identity, and EU overreach. Their messages warning of declining national sovereignty and dignity have resonated with many voters.

Critics argue that the rise of populism poses a real threat to liberal democratic norms and institutions in Europe. The demonization of outsider groups, disdain for international cooperation, and the majoritarian notion that populist movements singularly represent “the people” are all concerning trends. Time will tell how European democracies withstand the challenges from this new era of populism.

Populism in the Americas

Populism has surged in popularity in the Americas in recent years, with several populist leaders coming to power in North and South America.

The Trump Presidency

The election of Donald Trump to the presidency in 2016 marked a watershed moment for populism in the United States. Trump campaigned on a populist platform, claiming he would stand up for the “forgotten men and women” and restore power to the people. He railed against the establishment, including both Democrats and Republicans, and vowed to “drain the swamp.”

As president, Trump has enacted populist policies on immigration and trade. He has emphasized national sovereignty and enacted tariffs as part of an “America First” platform. However, his presidency has proven divisive, with critics arguing he is undermining democratic norms.

Rise of Populism in Latin America

In Latin America, populist leaders have risen to power in several key countries. These include Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, Andrés Manuel López Obrador in Mexico, and Nayib Bukele in El Salvador.

These populist leaders similarly campaigned on fighting corruption, defending national sovereignty, and giving power back to the people. They portray themselves as outsiders battling an elite establishment. However, critics argue their authoritarian tendencies and attacks on democratic institutions are dangerous.

Impacts on Democracy

The rise of populism has had significant impacts on democracy in the Americas. Supporters argue populists give voice to those feeling left behind by the system. However, critics counter that populism can erode democratic norms, institutions, and civil liberties.

There are concerns about a regression of democracy under populist rule. Key institutions like the judiciary, media, and electoral agencies have come under attack in some countries. However, the long-term impacts remain to be seen, as populism takes many shapes in the diverse political landscapes across the Americas.

Populism in Asia

Asia has seen a rise in populist movements in recent years, often revolving around religious identity and nationalism. Some key examples include:

Political Islam in Indonesia

Indonesia has witnessed the growth of conservative Islamic groups and ideologies since the fall of the authoritarian Suharto regime in 1998. Groups like the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) have gained prominence by tapping into religious populism and railing against the political establishment. The FPI and similar groups claim to represent the ‘true’ Muslim identity of Indonesia and are able to mobilize large crowds for mass protests. Conservative Muslim leaders often frame their messaging around defending Islam and traditional values against corrupting foreign influences and the secular elite.

Radicalism in the Middle East

Religious populism has also surged in parts of the Middle East, notably with the rise of radical Islamist groups like ISIS. These groups draw on fundamentalist interpretations of Islam and advocate a return to an idealized caliphate. Their messaging often focuses on fighting corrupt ruling regimes, restoring Muslim pride, and providing an alternative to dissatisfied populations. However, their extreme ideologies and violent methods have limited their mass appeal. Still, radical groups continue to recruit those disillusioned with stagnant economies and authoritarian rulers in the region.

Hindu Nationalism in India

India has witnessed a spike in Hindu nationalist populism in recent years, embodied by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The BJP promotes a narrative of resurgent Hindu pride, often at the expense of minority groups like Muslims. The party claims to represent the ‘true’ cultural identity of India and portrays the Congress party and secular elites as being out of touch with ordinary Hindus. This messaging along with promises of development helped the BJP gain power nationally, though its Hindu nationalist agenda remains divisive and controversial.

Criticisms of Populism

Populism has faced significant criticism from several angles. One major critique is the danger of authoritarianism. As populists claim to represent the unified will of “the people,” they often consolidate power and weaken democratic institutions designed to check authority and protect minority rights. The anti-pluralist nature of populism, where diverse perspectives are dismissed in favor of the populist leader’s singular vision of the people’s will, also threatens pluralism and diverse representation.

Another frequent criticism is that populism promotes the scapegoating and marginalization of minority groups, whether ethnic, religious, or political minorities. Populists often define “the people” in narrow terms that exclude portions of the population, then blame social ills on those excluded groups. This can foment prejudice, fuel hate crimes and human rights abuses, and tear societies apart. The dehumanizing rhetoric populists sometimes deploy against minorities and opponents is also seen as dangerous in possibly inciting violence.

Overall, critics argue that populism’s majoritarian, anti-pluralist nature often leads to the deterioration of democratic norms and the mistreatment of marginalized groups. They contend that more pluralistic forms of democratic governance provide greater representation, balance, and protection of minority rights. However, populism’s defenders counter that popular sovereignty and strong democratic mandates are positives, not dangers. The debate continues between those concerned populism undermines liberal democracy, and those who see value in aspects of populist movements and leaders.

Defining ‘the People’

Populist movements often rely on defining ‘the people’ in narrow, exclusionary terms that feed nationalism and xenophobia. Populists frequently portray ‘the people’ as a unified group with shared interests and values, often defined along racial, ethnic, religious, linguistic or national lines. This sense of collective identity is contrasted against an ‘out-group’ which is presented as a threat to the interests and wellbeing of ‘the people’.

Populists tend to define ‘the people’ as those who belong to the dominant ethnic or religious group within a society. Minorities and marginalized groups may be excluded from this conception of ‘the people’. Right-wing populists in particular propagate the notion that minorities are not truly part of the people or the nation. This helps engender a sense of grievance and resentment within the dominant group.

The narrow construction of ‘the people’ in populist discourse helps promote exclusive forms of nationalism that idealize the dominant group and its culture. It can breed chauvinism, racism, and xenophobia against minority groups and immigrants portrayed as ‘outsiders’. Constructing a sense of cultural or ethnic homogeneity ignores diversity within societies. It also enables the ‘othering’ of certain groups perceived as alien or disloyal to the nation due to their religion, ethnicity, values or traditions.

By propagating suspicion and resentment towards ‘outsiders’, populists can position themselves as the defender of ‘the people’ against dangerous ‘others’. This exclusionary nationalism serves their political interests but is harmful for social cohesion, tolerance, and inclusive forms of national identity. Unpacking how populists narrowly construct ‘the people’ is key to understanding their appeal and countering their divisive rhetoric.

Populist Leaders

Populism often relies on strong, charismatic figures to lead the movement. These leaders build a cult of personality around themselves, portraying their own identity as indistinguishable from the identity of the people and the nation.

Some examples of contemporary populist leaders include:

• Donald Trump in the United States devised the slogan “Make America Great Again,” directly tying himself to a nostalgic notion of the country’s past and presenting himself as the only figure capable of restoring that greatness. His inflammatory rhetoric and controversial policies consistently divide public opinion, energizing his supporters and outraging his opponents.

• Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkey combines religious fundamentalism and nationalist populism to consolidate his own power. He has become increasingly authoritarian, cracking down on dissent and free speech. Like other populists, Erdogan portrays himself as the sole representative of the Turkish people.

• Narendra Modi in India blends populism with Hindu nationalism. He appeals to distress among India’s Hindu majority related to income inequality and a perceived existential threat from the Muslim minority population. Modi projects a strongman image based on advancing a narrow Hindu nationalist agenda.

Populist leaders often rely more on their image than concrete policy positions. Their rhetoric divides society into “the people” and the “enemy other” who threatens them. By marketing themselves as the embodiment of the popular will, they aim to amass power while undermining democratic norms and institutions.

Countering Populism

Populism presents challenges to liberal democracy and inclusive governance. However, there are ways to counter the rise of populism:

Strengthening Institutions

Strong institutions that uphold the rule of law, separation of powers, and pluralism are essential to counter unchecked power. Initiatives to increase transparency, eliminate corruption, enforce checks and balances on the executive branch, and ensure the independence of the judiciary can help reinforce democracy against populist forces.

Grassroots Activism

Community organizing and civic participation can mobilize people power as a counterweight to populist movements. Youth, women, minorities, and other groups negatively affected by populism can advocate for their rights and interests through activism. Building connections across lines of difference through local initiatives fosters inclusion.

Promoting Pluralism

Dialogue, education, and awareness campaigns can reinforce shared values of diversity, tolerance, cooperation across differences, and respect for minority rights. Populism thrives on division, so initiatives that bring people together and highlight similarities rather than differences are important. Platforms for marginalized voices and efforts to increase understanding across groups counters the divisive ‘us vs them’ rhetoric of populists.

–